THE SOCIETY’S IRE AGAINST THE UNINHIBITED: FEMINISM RESPONDS


This article stems from a personal experience I always have. We have a small clothes stand which holds
the dirty laundry to be washed the next day. I always casually leave my dirty undergarments there to be
washed. Often I hear my mother disapproving of it when she sees the undergarments lying on top of the
pile, exposed and in full view. She says, “accha nahi lagta, thoda andar karke rakho”, or in other words, a
simple piece of clothing which women wear is considered as indecent to be shown publicly. It is common
experience amongst all, that we are constantly asked to sit a certain way, eat a certain way, speak a certain
way and conduct ourselves in ways which have traditionally been ‘socially acceptable’. So much so that
we casually tend to overlook the skewed gender equations in our day to day converstaions as well. In that
regard, I’d like to burst your bubble and tell you that, you are sexist, I am sexist, and we all are sexist.
Certain things that we may not realize are actually sexist, speaking from a strictly egalitarian point of
view in a gender narrative.
Feminism in this regard is a fight to achieve the utopian concept of “equal”. It thus becomes a response
against the ire that the society has for the uninhibited. Women if left free, to do things as they may please
is seen as challenging the nature’s equation of creating gender roles. However, nature has only created
certain biological roles which we wish to see, where women are the weaker sex and men are the ones who
protect them. There is a difference between biological roles and the consequent gender roles which stem
from how the society views them. Why is it that the society sees a working woman, who has a little less
time to “tend to her children” and who does not feel like cooking food after a long day at work
unbecoming of her? It stems from a deeply rooted stereotype arising from a biological role that women
have in the order of nature. Feminism seeks to question this very obsession with the inhibition for women
that the society has: why should not men be inhibited? Why should not men have the norms of conduct
which women are expected to follow? As a contrary, if men are not required to follow any code of
conduct, women should also be treated the same.
It does not take much to understand that the very society which establishes this nature of inhibition will
feel threatened if feminism comes in to question such inhibition. The power struggle of merit versus
entitlement only becomes all the more conspicuous in this regard. Achieving an equal society for women
thus becomes an organic process. The inhibitions have begun to be demolished as we progress, and it is
only a matter of time till we triumph on the image of a ‘weaker sex’ to an ‘equal sex’.
By Devangini Rai

Comments

Popular Posts